|
Kuster, N., & Schönborn, F. (2000). Recommended minimal requirements and development guidelines for exposure setups of bio-experiments addressing the health risk concern of wireless communications. Bioelectromagnetics, 21(7), 508–514.
|
|
|
Kuster, N., Torres, V. B., Nikoloski, N., Frauscher, M., & Kainz, W. (2006). Methodology of detailed dosimetry and treatment of uncertainty and variations for in vivo studies. Bioelectromagnetics, 27(5), 378–391.
|
|
|
Schuderer, J., Oesch, W., Felber, N., Spät, D., & Kuster, N. (2004). In vitro exposure apparatus for ELF magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 25(8), 582–591.
Abstract: For in vitro studies on the effect of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field exposures in different laboratories, a programmable, high precision exposure system enabling blinded exposures has been developed and fully characterized. It is based on two shielded 4 coil systems that fit inside a commercial incubator. The volume of uniform B field exposure with 1% field tolerance is 50% larger compared to a Merrit 4 coil system with the same coil volume. The uncertainties for the applied magnetic fields have been specified to be less than 4%. The computer controlled apparatus allows signal waveforms that are composed of several harmonics, blind protocols, monitoring of exposure and environmental conditions and the application of B fields up to 3.6 mT root-mean-square amplitude. Sources of artifacts have been characterized: sham isolation >43 dB, parasitic incident E fields <1 V/m, no recognizable temperature differences in the media for exposure or sham state, and vibrations of the mechanically decoupled dish holder <0.1 m/s2 (= 0.01 g), which is only twice the sham acceleration background level produced by the incubator and fan vibrations. Bioelectromagnetics 25:582–591, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
|
|
Kuster, N. (2008). Comments on the Brief Communication “Security considerations in blinded exposure experiments using electromagnetic waves†by Christian Wolf. Bioelectromagnetics, 29(8), 660–661.
|
|
|
Brix, J., Wettemann, H., Scheel, O., Feiner, F., & Matthes, R. (2001). Measurement of the individual exposure to 50 and 16 2/3 Hz magnetic fields within the Bavarian population. Bioelectromagnetics, 22(5), 323–332.
Abstract: This study investigates the individual magnetic field exposures at 16 2/3 and 50 Hz of 1952 people, selected from the Bavarian population. Personal flux density meters (“Field Watcher FW2A”) were worn by the participants for 24 h. Every second, the flux density was recorded for both frequencies and for the three spatial axes (dynamic range per axis: several nT up to 100 microT at 50 Hz, 150 microT at 16 2/3 Hz). For 50 Hz fields, the mean of the 1,952 individual means was 0.101 microT and that of the individual medians was 0.047 microT. High level exposures occurred mainly during working hours. Only 2.4% of the subjects showed individual medians higher than 0.2 microT. About 53% of all volunteers were working on the day of recording. Levels for craftsmen (n = 148; mean individual mean: 0.166 microT) were generally higher than those for office workers (n = 624; mean individual mean: 0.107 microT). Flux densities exceeding 100 microT at 50 Hz were measured in 31 persons. The total time with such extreme exposures amounts to nearly 21 min, less than 0.001% of the total time for all measurements (5.3 years). To our knowledge, this is the first exposure study where 16 2/3 Hz magnetic fields (caused by electrified railways) have additionally been monitored over 24 h. For persons living next to railway lines, the mean individual mean (0.156 microT) and mean individual median (0.102 microT) were calculated. Over all, the mean exposures are only 0.1% of the magnetic flux density limit for 50 Hz (100 microT) and about 0.05% of the limit (300 microT) for 16 2/3 Hz recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.
Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Environmental Exposure; Female; Germany; Housing; Humans; *Magnetics/*adverse effects; Male; Middle Aged; Occupational Exposure; Time Factors
|
|